|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: which are the best 40k armies? (multiple choice) | |||
| Space marines |
|
2 | 16.67% |
| Orks |
|
2 | 16.67% |
| Eldar |
|
4 | 33.33% |
| Necrons |
|
4 | 33.33% |
| Demon hunters |
|
3 | 25.00% |
| Imperial Guard |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| Chaos space marines |
|
2 | 16.67% |
| Dark Eldar |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| Sisters of battle |
|
0 | 0% |
| Tau |
|
5 | 41.67% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sanc kingdom
Posts: 493
|
Warhammer 40K
which army do you think is the best and why
i have to say its probably the demonhunters of the ordo mallus they kick arse and not to mention they look cool. after them it has to be the Ultramarines the new marnius calgar looks mint |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Unreg. Mutant Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 1,462
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
I stopped caring about this sort of thing a long, long time ago and I was more into Warhammer Fantasy armies anyway (undead, since you ask) but I always liked the Ork armies for their brutal simplicity and design
__________________
"I'm always happy. Which is kind of worrying when you really think about it." |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 118
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
i never played 40k but played the fantasy version. i played some lame ass human army thing, and lost interest unfortunatley quickly. if i was playing now i'd probably be orcs, i think their brutality and strength is so cool.... but back then i wasnt really into being the bad guy ^_^
__________________
Klaatu Barada Nikto - just to show i have some SFF knowledge ;) |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Unreg. Mutant Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 1,462
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
orks weren't bad - just misunderstood. And violent....really, really violent!
![]()
__________________
"I'm always happy. Which is kind of worrying when you really think about it." |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sanc kingdom
Posts: 493
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
yes and you would know would you ASGARD seems the only person you ever managed to win to by 'default' was a weedy little boy, you have not even played against any one with skill yet. and you bought your dark eldar from me anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Waiting at the Crossroads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Under a pile of paper
Posts: 1,311
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
lol
Be told! ![]()
__________________
Honrai mu Ichibutsu To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
inferior beings to die
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: wales
Posts: 56
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
That is slander and liable and in the words of the Scoley I will take you to court over a sandwich!
So go suck on an Avocado. By the way have you got a medical condition? Because you head is swelling up! Tsujigiri what are you laugh at the mirror. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Admin and Tea-boy
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,876
|
Re: Warhammer 40K
Whoah! Warhammer 40k is still around??
I remember when they first released this and I bought into it - very frustrating, as every month White Dwarf would have new rules, which effectively killed gameplay if you didn't have the latest edition, and everyone was chasing the rules version which suited them best. I seem to remember at one point Eldar became so over-weighted and uneven to match, but I guess WD has been re-writing the rules continually since then. I will say it clear, and say it now - Warhammer battle 2nd edition was the king of mass battles. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|